![]() |
Foreclosure Forum |
|
Re: Improperly Reversed Sale?In Reply to: Improperly Reversed Sale? posted by SeanW on November 07, 2003 at 6:47 PM : Ward, what do you think of this situation? : Deed in name of H & W. : #1 This happened to me, but I don't understand why the sale could be reversed, if H had no interest in the property anymore. : #2 If the husband's BK does produce a valid stay, why would the trustee conduct a sale, when the BK was ALREADY filed? Why not just postpone? I had assumed because the sale did take place, this BK was not going to be a problem. Sean: Looks simple to me. The note and deed of trust control..not the QCD. The husband can QCD or deed to whomever he wants. That does not remove him from the note and deed of trust and leaves him liable. One of the problems the Sub2 guys have is that they invest and then the owner declares BK, etc. Therefore I believe that the lender had not choice but to respect the husband's BK, rescind the sale and start the removal of the stay, etc. Then go forward with the sale.
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup:
|
Information provided by this website is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. Please consult your investment advisor and/or attorney before entering into any transaction. Read our privacy policy.
Copyright © 1997-2003, InnoVest Resource Management
http://www.foreclosureforum.com
InnoVest Resource Management, 4569-A Mission Gorge Place, San Diego CA 92120-4112
(619) 283-5444, Fax (619) 283-5455