Grandpa Ward and high school grad, Chris.

InnoVest Resource Management's

Foreclosure Forum

Home

Discussion Board

"Hands-On" Training

Title Holding Trust

Speaking Schedule

Store

Foreclosure Codes

50 State Resource Data

Foreclosure Glossary

Foreclosure Statistics

60+ Yrs Interest Rates

Fillable Forms

Archived Articles

Dingbat Retirement Plan

Links

Contact / Map

Home

 

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Forum Board ] [ FAQ ]

CC 1695 and CC 2945 Intersection.

Posted by David on July 29, 2003 at 9:25 AM

Ward,

If I buy a pre-foreclosure in compliance with CC 1695, could it somehow be argued that I violated CC 2945? For example, my service was stopping the foreclosure and my fee was the equity, but there was no foreclosure consultant agreement as required by CC 2945.

Conversely, if I consult a pre-foreclosure in compliance with CC 2945, could it ever be argued I somehow violated CC 1695? For example, my fee for stopping the foreclosure was a note which I had to foreclose on for non-payment so the substance of the transaction is that I bought the house but did not have and EPA as required by CC 1695.

I know this is theoretical but I also know some attorneys can do magic with words.

Regards,
David

P.S. I don’t sit around ALL day and dream up this stuff, only during my morning coffee.


Follow Ups:


Post a Followup:

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Subject : 
Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Forum Board ] [ FAQ ]

WWWAdmin 2.0a © 1997 Matt Wright and DBasics Software Company, All Rights Reserved

Information provided by this website is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. Please consult your investment advisor and/or attorney before entering into any transaction.

Copyright © 1997-2003, InnoVest Resource Management
http://www.foreclosureforum.com

InnoVest Resource Management, 4569-A Mission Gorge Place, San Diego CA 92120-4112
(619) 283-5444, Fax (619) 283-5455

[an error occurred while processing this directive]