![]() |
Foreclosure Forum |
|
Re: may be violation of CC890In Reply to: may be violation of CC890 posted by Travis-CA on June 27, 2003 at 6:33 PM Travis: thanks for your reply. I am familiar with Civil Code 890. However, given that adverse possession involves "trespassing" and "other unauthorized means" of taking possession, rent skimming is the least of my worries. Also note that rent skimming applies during only the first year of ownership when a mortgage is involved. Go figure. It's a poorly written code. Again, this is why I'd like to hear from an attorney who has seen adverse possession combined with qta in the courtroom. Sincerely, Kristine
Follow Ups: Post a Followup:
|
Information provided by this website is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. Please consult your investment advisor and/or attorney before entering into any transaction.
Copyright © 1997-2003, InnoVest Resource Management
http://www.foreclosureforum.com
InnoVest Resource Management, 4569-A Mission Gorge Place, San Diego CA 92120-4112
(619) 283-5444, Fax (619) 283-5455