Grandpa Ward, Elsa, and Helen at Reuben H. Fleet Science Center

InnoVest Resource Management's

Foreclosure Forum


Discussion Board

"Hands-On" Training

Title Holding Trust

Annual Reunion

Speaking Schedule


Foreclosure Fundamentals

Code References

50 State Foreclosure Basics

Foreclosure Glossary

Foreclosure Statistics

75+ Yrs Interest Rates

Fillable Forms

Archived Articles

Dingbat Retirement Plan


Contact / Map | Priceline Tips

About Us



Innovest Resource Management BBB Business Review

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Forum Board ] [ FAQ ]

Re: Slighty Off Topic but of interest none the less:

Posted by Darryle-Ca on July 30, 2011 at 6:10 AM

In Reply to: Re: Slighty Off Topic but of interest none the less: posted by Kristine-CA on July 25, 2011 at 8:11 PM

: I'll bite. I'd like to read a lawsuit, in CA, proving that the property was "Free and Clear" from the beginning. Please post or send me any relevant names or case numbers.

: There is a bizarre and consistent insistence on the existence of these cases and never, ever any facts. I'm all ears and eyes. Please post a case that proved that a CA property was free and clear from the beginning.

: : : : : I'm running into a lot of homeowners in distress that are being duped
: : : : : by scam artists claiming that can sue the bank and get their house
: : : : : "Free and Clear". Anyone else running into this? What ammunition
: : : : : are you using to help reeducate people on the facts? Here's one of the
: : : : : guys promoting this crap:
: : : : :

: : : : Which facts are you referring to?

: : : I believe it's a myth that the end result of a lawsuit will be a "Free and Clear" house. It's a fact that I don't know of ONE CASE where someone sued the bank in California and has won a "Free and Clear" home.

: : You’re right, there’s not ONE CASE in California where someone has successfully sued a bank and won a free and clear home.

: : However, there are those who have filed lawsuits, proving that their properties were “Free and Clear” from the beginning.

Please read,Pineda Jose L v GMAC et al Docket Report 08-cv-05341-AHM-PJW.
It can be found in the Central District of California, Los Angeles Division.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup:

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Subject : 

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Forum Board ] [ FAQ ]

WWWAdmin 2.0a © 1997 Matt Wright and DBasics Software Company, All Rights Reserved

Information provided by this website is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. Please consult your investment advisor and/or attorney before entering into any transaction. Read our privacy policy.

Copyright © 1997-date("Y"), InnoVest Resource Management

InnoVest Resource Management, 4569-A Mission Gorge Place, San Diego CA 92120-4112
(619) 283-5444, Fax (619) 283-5455