![]() |
Foreclosure Forum |
|
Shouldn't be a recording problemIn Reply to: Re: The priority of simultaneously/concurrently recorded trust deeds – revisited and summarized posted by DaveW in LA on December 14, 2007 at 12:56 AM I'm in the suquential number camp. If the documents are perfecting my own personal lien, I'd hand the documents separately to the clerk in the order that I'd want them recorded. The first document would be date/numbered stamped before I physically gave the second document. Granted this eliminates recording them by mail, so either yourself or a trusted associate would physically have to take them to the recorder's office. In a large county like Los Angeles or Orange you could be dealing with a different clerk everytime, but in other counties usually after a trip or two you usually learn quickly who the best and brightest clerks (I get their business cards and make notations) are in any assessor's, clerk's, or recorder's office are if you visit them even semi-regularly. I've never been in the LA or Orange County offices so I can't comment on their office's esprit de corps, but I have been in some county offices nearly as large as LA and the attitudes can be quite bad. Smaller counties are usually less busy and quite helpful.
Follow Ups: Post a Followup:
|
Information provided by this website is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. Please consult your investment advisor and/or attorney before entering into any transaction. Read our privacy policy.
Copyright © 1997-2007, InnoVest Resource Management
http://www.foreclosureforum.com
InnoVest Resource Management, 4569-A Mission Gorge Place, San Diego CA 92120-4112
(619) 283-5444, Fax (619) 283-5455