Grandpa Ward & Helen watching kindergarten graduation

InnoVest Resource Management's

Foreclosure Forum

Home

Discussion Board

"Hands-On" Training

Title Holding Trust

Speaking Schedule

Store

Code References

50 State Resource Data

Foreclosure Glossary

Foreclosure Statistics

70+ Yrs Interest Rates

Fillable Forms

Archived Articles

Dingbat Retirement Plan

Links

Contact / Map

About Us

Home

 

BBBOnLine Reliability Seal

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Forum Board ] [ FAQ ]

I may have answered my own question.....!

Posted by Brian Lund on August 15, 2006 at 4:43 PM

In Reply to: Re: Abtract of Judgement and Trust posted by Brian Lund on August 14, 2006 at 7:28 AM

I read through CCP Section 709.010-709.030, and it seems as if this section provides the remedy.

Specifically CCP 709.020 which reads....

"The judgment creditor may apply to the court on noticed
motion for an order applying to the satisfaction of a money judgment
a contingent remainder, executory interest, or other interest of the
judgment debtor in property that is not vested in the judgment
debtor. The interest of the judgment debtor may be applied to the
satisfaction of the money judgment by such means as the court, in its
discretion, determines are proper to protect the interests of both
the judgment debtor and judgment creditor, including but not limited
to the imposition of a lien on or the sale of the judgment debtor's
interest."

It does specify a noticed motion, which would make me think that you could not do it at the same time as the debtor's exam, becuase beneficial interest would not be established until you examined the trust paperowrk at that hearing. However I wonder if you are able to introduce the motion "ex parte" right at the time beneficial interest is established.

Anyone know that answer....?

Also, 709.010 (b) references making a petition to "a court having jurisdiciton over administration of the trust as prescribed in Part 5 of Division 9 of the Probate Code".

That part of the code seems to indicate that the Superior Court in the county that is the "principal place of administration of the trust", is the court having jurisdiction. And the principal place of administration of a trust in which an individual is trustee (or co-trustees) is their residence or normal place of business.

Am I getting this right?

Thanks,
-Brian


Follow Ups:


Post a Followup:

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Subject : 
Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Forum Board ] [ FAQ ]

WWWAdmin 2.0a © 1997 Matt Wright and DBasics Software Company, All Rights Reserved

Information provided by this website is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. Please consult your investment advisor and/or attorney before entering into any transaction. Read our privacy policy.

Copyright © 1997-2006, InnoVest Resource Management
http://www.foreclosureforum.com

InnoVest Resource Management, 4569-A Mission Gorge Place, San Diego CA 92120-4112
(619) 283-5444, Fax (619) 283-5455

[an error occurred while processing this directive]