![]() |
Foreclosure Forum |
|
So 2nd can become the 1st so to speak?In Reply to: Re: Lien priorites posted by Ward-CA- on October 17, 2001 at 6:36 AM
Your statement below has set off bells and whistles in my head and I want to be sure I understand this. Bob takes out a 1st to buy a house on Jan 1 for $100 In this scenario is the second now considered first priority and if the second foreclosed, the first would be wiped out? : : First question is whether liens get removed by some sort of automatic function, or do I have to request they be removed after I purchase based on the junior lien theory? : : Second, this is public records information on this person. As you can see she has been busy. I am going to the recorders office tomorrow to look at them but wanted to ask Ward if these would all go away if the loan being foreclosed is that dated Sept 7, 1999 since all the others come later. : : Last... Let's someone say took out the 1st on Sept 7, 1999. : : Thanks : =•=•=•=•=•=•=•=•=•=•=•=•= : Eric, nothing gets removed in the public record—it’s there for posterity. It’s just understood the foreclosure of a senior lien acts to wipe off all the junior liens and interests caught between the recording date of the senior lien and the sale date of the recorded trustee’s deed. : In the above example, all the liens junior to the 9-7-00 trust deed would be wiped off the title record by said trust deed. : When a lien is refinanced it is paid off and replaced by a newer lien. Timewise the replacement lien takes it’s priority from when it was recorded, not when the original lien (that’s now paid off) was recorded. So if in the interim another lien is recorded, then that lien would advance in seniority to 1st position, given the payoff of the original 1st lien.
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup:
|
Copyright © 1997-2001, InnoVest Resource Management
InnoVest Resource Management, 4569-A Mission Gorge Place, San Diego CA 92120-4112
(619) 283-5444, Fax (619) 283-5455