InnoVest Resource Management's Foreclosure Forum

Home Discussion Board "Hands-On" Training Title Holding Trust Speaking Schedule Store Foreclosure Fundamentals Code References 50 State Foreclosure Basics Foreclosure Glossary Foreclosure Statistics 70+ Yrs Interest Rates Fillable Forms Archived Articles Dingbat Retirement Plan Links Contact / Map About Us Home

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Forum Board ] [ FAQ ] Re: Trusts - My Plan Make Sense? Posted by hard money lender on April 22, 2008 at 10:46 AM In Reply to: Re: Trusts - My Plan Make Sense? posted by Jerry - Ca. on April 22, 2008 at 10:06 AM from the wiki article. In the law of trusts the term "doctrine of merger" refers to the fusing of legal and equitable title in the event the same person becomes both the sole trustee and the sole beneficiary of a trust. In such a case, the trust is sometimes deemed to have terminated (with the result that the beneficiary owns the trust property outright). "sometimes deemed to be terminated ?" what the heck does that mean. one day it is, and another day it isnt ? if this were true, then a gazillion trusts that own property would be deemed to have terminated. i sincerely do not believe you have a correct understanding. in this particular case, the trustee is not the sole beneficiary. i dont have any interest in researching something until it makes sense for me to research it. this does not seem to jive with real life happenings. so yes, i would say that you need to prove what you are saying to everyone here on the board, since the burden of your claim is on you. Follow Ups: Re: Trusts - My Plan Make Sense? Jerry - Ca. 11:38 AM, 04/22/08 (3) Re: Trusts - My Plan Make Sense? hard money lender 6:35 PM, 04/22/08 (2) Correct! (nt) Jerry - Ca. 6:52 PM, 04/22/08 (1) Re: Correct! But???? Mark Hamilton 11:24 AM, 04/26/08 (0) Post a Followup: Name : E-Mail : Subject : Comments: : from the wiki article. : In the law of trusts the term "doctrine of merger" refers to the fusing of legal and equitable title in the event the same person becomes both the sole trustee and the sole beneficiary of a trust. In such a case, the trust is sometimes deemed to have terminated (with the result that the beneficiary owns the trust property outright). : "sometimes deemed to be terminated ?" : what the heck does that mean. one day it is, and another day it isnt ? : if this were true, then a gazillion trusts that own property would be deemed to have terminated. : i sincerely do not believe you have a correct understanding. : in this particular case, the trustee is not the sole beneficiary. : i dont have any interest in researching something until it makes sense for me to research it. : this does not seem to jive with real life happenings. : so yes, i would say that you need to prove what you are saying to everyone here on the board, since the burden of your claim is on you. [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Forum Board ] [ FAQ ] WWWAdmin 2.0a © 1997 Matt Wright and DBasics Software Company, All Rights Reserved

Information provided by this website is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. Please consult your investment advisor and/or attorney before entering into any transaction. Read our privacy policy.

Copyright © 1997-2008, InnoVest Resource Management
http://www.foreclosureforum.com

InnoVest Resource Management, 4569-A Mission Gorge Place, San Diego CA 92120-4112
(619) 283-5444, Fax (619) 283-5455