It's movie time!

InnoVest Resource Management's

Foreclosure Forum

Home

Discussion Board

"Hands-On" Training

Title Holding Trust

Speaking Schedule

Store

Foreclosure Fundamentals

Code References

50 State Foreclosure Basics

Foreclosure Glossary

Foreclosure Statistics

70+ Yrs Interest Rates

Fillable Forms

Archived Articles

Dingbat Retirement Plan

Links

Contact / Map

About Us

Home

 

BBBOnLine Reliability Seal

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Forum Board ] [ FAQ ]

Re: Trusts - My Plan Make Sense?

Posted by Mark Hamilton on April 21, 2008 at 4:32 PM

In Reply to: Re: Trusts - My Plan Make Sense? posted by Jerry - Ca. on April 21, 2008 at 3:27 PM

Now that you mentioned it, on the trust tape Ward had two trusts for one property go into a single joint venture for tax purposes. BUT he was the only beneficary on both (and I assume his LLC was the trustee). Yes, I should take the course but given that I live in N. California I don't look forward to the expense - but I am sure it is worth it. So this complicates it.
So, I guess the only option is to have one land trust, with three beneficiaries and a third party trustee (like Fin. Fitness or Albany Bank, etc.). It won't save on withholding at sale but it will provide some privacy and, I suppose, a little bit of liability protection (although I understand that it is not much). Yep, I do need that course - too bad there is not a self-study version.

: Hello HML:

: With Illinois type Land Trusts ... not Testamentary Trusts like you use all the time ... the Legal and Equitable Tile is conveyed to the Trustee and a deed is recorded. There can only be ONE recorded deed transferring legal and equitable title to real property!

: I explained that with a Trust having more than one Beneficiary, if a Beneficiary is also the Trustee it invalidates the Trust through the "Doctrine of Merger" which is acknowledged by state law. A Beneficiary acting as a Trustee can hardly be considered a "neutral third party" dealing at arms-length ... like that of an escrow service.

: Jerry-Ca.

: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
: : hi jerry,

: : you certainly can have 3 separate trusts, each with partial ownership of a piece of property.

: : and i cant see why a co-beneficiary cant be the sole trustee.

: : perhaps i am not understanding what you are saying.



Follow Ups:


Post a Followup:

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Subject : 
Comments:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Forum Board ] [ FAQ ]

WWWAdmin 2.0a © 1997 Matt Wright and DBasics Software Company, All Rights Reserved

Information provided by this website is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. Please consult your investment advisor and/or attorney before entering into any transaction. Read our privacy policy.

Copyright © 1997-2008, InnoVest Resource Management
http://www.foreclosureforum.com

InnoVest Resource Management, 4569-A Mission Gorge Place, San Diego CA 92120-4112
(619) 283-5444, Fax (619) 283-5455