|
Foreclosure Forum |
|
|
Civil Code 2898In Reply to: Re: AJ recorded 10/23/03, but prior to mortgage from 7/22/04 posted by Jerry - Ca. on April 13, 2008 at 2:26 PM : : You may be right. Perhaps Ward missed the recording dates. : : I guess that it's possible that if the $355K mortgage were purchase money, the lender may not have required the AJ to be satisfied. : : Alternatively, we occassionally leave AJ in senior position on our private money probate deals because I know how to deal with them later in the unlikely event that I've have to. : : But you're right, this is a race to record State. From a practical standpoint I'd be surprised if this AJ still survives as the mortgage lender would have most likely (but not certainly) required the AJ paid (or at least released from the PIQ). : : Any other perspectives? : XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX : You said that lender might not have required that prior AJ be paid-off if the loan was a "purchase money" loan. I've never seen a lender on a purchase money loan not require the AJ to paid off and assume Junior priority position. If a refi ... hard money loan maybe. : Also, David, remember that even though the IRS lien grts wiped-off title ... The IRS has a 90-day Right-Of-Redemption(ROR) that you'll have to "sweat-out"! : Jerry - CA. Jerry, Take a look at Civil Code 2898 and you'll see what that Cranky Probate Guy is talking about. It happens ALL the time. (a) A mortgage or deed of trust given for the price of real
Follow Ups: Post a Followup:
|
Information provided by this website is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. Please consult your investment advisor and/or attorney before entering into any transaction. Read our privacy policy.
Copyright © 1997-2008, InnoVest Resource Management
http://www.foreclosureforum.com
InnoVest Resource Management, 4569-A Mission Gorge Place, San Diego CA 92120-4112
(619) 283-5444, Fax (619) 283-5455