InnoVest Resource Management's Foreclosure Forum

Home Discussion Board "Hands-On" Training Title Holding Trust Speaking Schedule Store Foreclosure Fundamentals Code References 50 State Foreclosure Basics Foreclosure Glossary Foreclosure Statistics 70+ Yrs Interest Rates Fillable Forms Archived Articles Dingbat Retirement Plan Links Contact / Map About Us Home

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Forum Board ] [ FAQ ] AJ recorded 10/23/03, but prior to mortgage from 7/22/04 Posted by Rick, the Probate Guy on April 13, 2008 at 1:38 PM In Reply to: I don't think so... posted by Ward-CA- on April 13, 2008 at 11:23 AM You may be right. Perhaps Ward missed the recording dates. I guess that it's possible that if the $355K mortgage were purchase money, the lender may not have required the AJ to be satisfied. Alternatively, we occassionally leave AJ in senior position on our private money probate deals because I know how to deal with them later in the unlikely event that I've have to. But you're right, this is a race to record State. From a practical standpoint I'd be surprised if this AJ still survives as the mortgage lender would have most likely (but not certainly) required the AJ paid (or at least released from the PIQ). Any other perspectives? Follow Ups: Dummie me.... Ward-CA- 4:26 PM, 04/13/08 (0) Re: AJ recorded 10/23/03, but prior to mortgage from 7/22/04 Jerry - Ca. 2:26 PM, 04/13/08 (2) Civil Code 2898 Travis, the Judgment Guy 9:51 PM, 04/15/08 (0) IRS has 120 Day RoR...NOT ...90 (nt) Bill H 7:02 PM, 04/13/08 (0) Post a Followup: Name : E-Mail : Subject : Comments: : You may be right. Perhaps Ward missed the recording dates. : I guess that it's possible that if the $355K mortgage were purchase money, the lender may not have required the AJ to be satisfied. : Alternatively, we occassionally leave AJ in senior position on our private money probate deals because I know how to deal with them later in the unlikely event that I've have to. : But you're right, this is a race to record State. From a practical standpoint I'd be surprised if this AJ still survives as the mortgage lender would have most likely (but not certainly) required the AJ paid (or at least released from the PIQ). : Any other perspectives? [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ The Forum Board ] [ FAQ ] WWWAdmin 2.0a © 1997 Matt Wright and DBasics Software Company, All Rights Reserved

Information provided by this website is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. Please consult your investment advisor and/or attorney before entering into any transaction. Read our privacy policy.

Copyright © 1997-2008, InnoVest Resource Management
http://www.foreclosureforum.com

InnoVest Resource Management, 4569-A Mission Gorge Place, San Diego CA 92120-4112
(619) 283-5444, Fax (619) 283-5455