|
Foreclosure Forum |
|
|
Re: Most Likely (read on)In Reply to: Re: Most Likely (read on) posted by k2163 on March 21, 2008 at 8:50 PM
Ken, I do not have an 'authoritative citation' for you on that one, nor do I even have a case story for you. This came from my lawyer and as he put it, "If you REFINANCED any purchae money loans, or paid down purchase money HELOC and drew down on it again, the purchase money rule does not apply." : You state: : "However, if the 2nd loan was a HELOC and the HELOC was paid down then any re-draw on the HELOC is considered to now be a recourse draw; it is no longer a non-recourse loan. Silly, but true." : I'm not trying to be rude but do you have an authoritative citation for that conclusion? I beleive you may be correct but all the cases I've read do not cover such a fact pattern and I've read most of the big cases. California just for clairification. : Cheers, : Ken
: : However, if the 2nd loan was a HELOC and the HELOC was paid down then any re-draw on the HELOC is considered to now be a recourse draw; it is no longer a non-recourse loan. Silly, but true. : : Troy : : : If the 1st and 2nd liens are California purchase money loans (different lenders) and the first forecloses and thereby wipes the 2nd, is the 2nd thereby prevented from seeking a deficiency judgment against the borrower after the FC because of the purchase money status of the loan? : : : Thanks, Matt
Follow Ups: Post a Followup:
|
Information provided by this website is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional advice. Please consult your investment advisor and/or attorney before entering into any transaction. Read our privacy policy.
Copyright © 1997-2008, InnoVest Resource Management
http://www.foreclosureforum.com
InnoVest Resource Management, 4569-A Mission Gorge Place, San Diego CA 92120-4112
(619) 283-5444, Fax (619) 283-5455